Pain Associated With Monkeypox Virus: A Rapid Review.

International concerns for another pandemic arose after emerging reports of an ongoing outbreak of the monkeypox virus (MPXV) in Europe and the United States in 2022. Severe pain is one of the most distressing complications for patients in the current outbreak, but there is a general paucity of relevant peer-reviewed medical literature from which to draw clear recommendations on appropriate pain therapies. The Centers for Disease Control recently published a letter in July 2022 urging providers to conduct further studies concerning pain management. Thus, a rapid literature search was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search of several databases from inception until August 19, 2022, was conducted. All published studies describing pain in patients who tested positive for MPXV with original data and written in English were included. Sixty-nine studies were initially identified for screening. After initial screening, 27 papers were considered for full-text review, and 15 papers met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1043 positive cases were included in this study. Most patients were men. Treatment options proposed by the authors include acetaminophen, ibuprofen, opioids, lidocaine gel, metamizole, and rectal suppositories containing emollients or steroids with oral laxatives for severe anal pain. Although most cases were mild requiring outpatient treatment, a considerable number of patients were admitted due to serious complications. Severe pain was often the reason to seek medical attention and hospital admission for pain control. Analgesic plans included oral and topical analgesia. In severe cases, pain was managed with opioids. To our knowledge, this rapid review is the first study to comprehensively summarize proposed treatments for pain associated with MPXV. Guidelines may be needed to help direct the best management to avoid morbidity in patients, particularly as adjuvants may play a key role but are not commonly utilized in published reports.

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation for chronic refractory neuropathic pain: a unique series.

During the last two decades, with the advent of recent technology, peripheral nerve stimulation has become an appealing modality at the forefront of pain management. In this case series, we document the clinical rationale and technical considerations on three of the most challenging cases, refractory to previous interventions, that were treated by our team with an ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulator targeting the musculocutaneous, bilateral greater occipital and subcostal nerves. At the 6-month follow-up, all patients experienced greater than 50% relief of baseline pain, with a near-complete resolution of pain exacerbations. Furthermore, to our knowledge, this is the first report of an ultrasound-guided percutaneous technique of a peripheral nerve stimulator targeting the musculocutaneous and subcostal nerves.

Peripheral nerve stimulation is a new tool used in the treatment of peripheral nerve pain. In this study, we share our experience using this technology in three unusual, difficult-to-treat chronic nerve pain presentations, targeting the musculocutaneous, bilateral greater occipital and subcostal nerves. All patients were asked about how pain levels had changed since the peripheral nerve stimulation device had been implanted. In every case, patients reported a decline in their pain level from day one. After 6 months of peripheral nerve stimulator use, all patients reported a greater than 50% pain relief.

A case for ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve stimulation in intractable anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome.

Aim: This case report documents the use of peripheral nerve stimulation in the setting of entrapment of the anterior cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves, with pain rated by the patient as severe during exacerbation episodes. Materials & methods: Under ultrasound guidance, two permanent leads were implanted caudad to cephalad, along and superficial to the lateral aspect of the rectus abdominis, distal to the umbilicus (1 lead per side). Results: At the 6 month follow-up, the patient reported near complete resolution of baseline pain, as well as fewer, sporadic pain exacerbation episodes, rated as mild-to-moderate. Conclusion: This case report suggests that peripheral nerve stimulation might be a valuable treatment option for previously intractable abdominal pain due to entrapment of the anterior cutaneous branches.

Anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome is a peculiar, a largely disregarded pain condition. Current management algorithms rely mostly on local injections followed by surgical anterior neurectomy. This case report presents a case of longstanding, anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome, unresponsive to first-line treatment, that was successfully treated with peripheral nerve stimulation technology targeting the anterior cutaneous branches.

Ultrasound-Guided Gluteal Fascial Plane Block for the Treatment of Chronic Refractory Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome - Technique Description and Anatomical Correlation Study.

INTRODUCTION: Greater trochanteric pain syndrome may often mimic pain generated from other sources. However, it is most commonly caused by gluteus medius and gluteus minimus tendinopathy or tear. The purpose of this technical report was to: 1) describe the ultrasound-guided fascial plane block technique targeting the superior gluteal nerve in the plane between gluteus medius/gluteus minimus to treat moderate-to-severe, chronic, refractory greater trochanteric pain syndrome; 2) anatomically correlate the procedure with cadaveric dissections demonstrating the structures being imaged and the tissues along the needle trajectory; 3) demonstrate the feasibility of the technique with serial dissection of one cadaveric specimen following injection with color dye. TECHNIQUE DESCRIPTION: The ultrasound-guided fascial plane block targeting the superior gluteal nerve to treat moderate-to-severe, chronic, refractory greater trochanteric pain syndrome has been outlined with supporting ultrasound scans and anatomical dissections. The cadaveric dissections are correlated to the ultrasound scans of a healthy volunteer and provide visualization of the tissues in the needle trajectory. The feasibility study in a cadaveric specimen showed adequate stain of the superior gluteal nerve without spread to the piriformis muscle belly, the sciatic nerve, or the inferior gluteal nerve. CONCLUSIONS: This ultrasound-guided fascial plane block is a feasible option for blocking the superior gluteal nerve without inadvertent involvement of the sciatic and inferior gluteal nerves. Further randomized controlled clinical trials are necessary to assess the clinical efficacy of the gluteus medius/gluteus minimus fascial plane block to treat moderate-to-severe, chronic, refractory greater trochanteric pain syndrome.

Comparative Effectiveness of Landmark-guided Greater Occipital Nerve (GON) Block at the Superior Nuchal Line Versus Ultrasound-guided GON Block at the Level of C2: A Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT).

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this single center, prospective randomized controlled trial was to compare clinical outcomes between an ultrasound-guided greater occipital nerve block (GONB) at the C2 vertebral level versus landmark-based GONB at the superior nuchal line. METHODS: Patients with occipital neuralgia or cervicogenic headache were randomized to receive either a landmark-based GONB with sham ultrasound at the superior nuchal line or ultrasound-guided GONB at the C2 vertebral level with blinding of patients and data analysis investigators. Clinical outcomes were assessed at 30 minutes, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks postinjection. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were recruited with 16 participants in each group. Despite randomization, the ultrasound-guided GONB group reported higher numeric rating scale (NRS) scores at baseline. Those in the ultrasound-guided GONB group had a significant decrease in NRS from baseline compared with the landmark-based GONB group at 30 minutes (change of NRS of 4.0 vs. 2.0) and 4-week time points (change of NRS of 2.5 vs. -0.5). Both groups were found to have significant decreases in Headache Impact Test-6. The ultrasound-guided GONB had significant improvements in NRS, severe headache days, and analgesic use at 4 weeks when compared with baseline. No serious adverse events occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided GONBs may provide superior pain reduction at 4 weeks when compared with landmark-based GONBs for patients with occipital neuralgia or cervicogenic headache.

Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Applications in Chronic Pain Medicine: Establishing a Framework for Future Research - A Narrative Review.

BACKGROUND: During the last decades, platelet-rich plasma has been studied for the treatment of multiple chronic pain conditions, in addition to being employed in the enhancement of healing after tissue injury. OBJECTIVE: To establish a framework for future research regarding the utilization of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of chronic tissue injuries. METHODS: Preclinical and clinical studies from 2000-2020 relevant to applications of platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of chronic pain conditions were extracted from PubMed and Medline databases. The studies were analyzed on the basis of the study population, type of intervention, method of platelet-rich plasma preparation, the number of treatments administered, the timeframe of injections, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Although several preclinical studies and double-blind, randomized trials have shown promising results in the application of platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of multiple chronic pain conditions, various studies have also reported controversial results. Additionally, the methods employed for obtaining the platelet-rich plasma have not been standardized between studies, resulting in different concentrations of blood components between the preparations utilized. Moreover, differences between studies were also found regarding the number of injections administered per treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Future research addressing the utilization of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of chronic pain conditions should focus on shedding light on the following major questions: a) Is there a dose-effect relation between the platelet count and the clinical efficacy of the preparation?; b) What pathology determinants should be considered when selecting between leukocyte-enriched and leukocyte-depleted concentrates?; c) What is the role of platelet activation methods on the clinical efficacy of platelet-rich plasma?; d) Is there an optimal number of injections and time frame for application of multiple injection treatment cycles?; e) Does the addition of local anesthetics affect the clinical efficacy of platelet-rich plasma?; and f) Is there potential for future platelet-rich plasma applications for the treatment of neuropathic pain of peripheral origin?

Ultrasound-guided diagnostic IPACK as a valuable tool in the management of a patient with soleal sling syndrome: a doubly rare case report.

This article describes the use of an infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee joint (IPACK) to diagnose an entrapment neuropathy of the tibial nerve (TN) in a patient presenting with chronic neuropathic pain in the medial posterior compartment of the left knee, with a previous electromyography showing no evidence of tibial or common peroneal nerve neuropathy. After a positive sciatic nerve block, the patient was evaluated for a TN block, cancelled due to the presence of an abnormal leash of vessels wrapping around the nerve. For this reason, the patient was submitted to a diagnostic IPACK. A negative IPACK suggested that a compression of the TN at the popliteal fossa was the most likely source of the symptoms. After surgical decompression of the TN nerve at the popliteal fossa, the patient's symptoms decreased substantially.

Lay abstract This case report describes the use of an infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee joint (IPACK), a technique in which local anesthetic is injected between the popliteal artery and the back side of the knee joint, to diagnose a compression of the tibial nerve (TN) in a patient with chronic knee pain. A female adult patient presented for further evaluation of chronic pain in the inner side of the back of her left knee. A previous electromyography showed no evidence of tibial or common peroneal nerve disease. After a positive diagnostic block of the left sciatic nerve, the patient was evaluated for a left TN block, so as to ascertain whether a compression of this nerve at the back side of the knee could be the origin of the patient's symptoms. During the ultrasound scanning of the TN, a group of abnormal vessels was found wrapping around the nerve, which made it impossible to inject the TN in a safe manner, even with the guidance of ultrasound. For this reason, the patient was instead submitted to a diagnostic left IPACK. A negative IPACK suggested that a compression of the TN at the popliteal fossa, the region behind the knee joint, was the most likely source of the patient's symptoms. After surgical decompression of the TN at the popliteal fossa, the patient's symptoms decreased substantially.

Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block vs trigger point injections for chronic abdominal wall pain: a randomized clinical trial.

ABSTRACT: The primary aim of this randomized clinical trial is to investigate the effects of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) vs ultrasound-guided trigger point injections (TPIs) on numerical rating scale pain scores at month 3 follow-up in patients with a chronic abdominal wall pain. The primary outcome measure was the difference in mean numeric rating scale pain scores between the TAP and TPI groups at month 3 in an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis. A total of 60 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive an ultrasound-guided TAP block (n = 30) or an ultrasound-guided TPI (n = 30). No significant group differences in baseline demographic or clinical characteristics were observed. The mean baseline pain score for the TAP and TPI groups was 5.5 and 4.7, respectively. In the ITT analysis at month 3, the between-group difference in pain scores was 1.7 (95% confidence interval, 0.3-3.0) favoring the TPI group. In a secondary per-protocol analysis, the between-group difference in pain scores was 1.8 (95% confidence interval, 0.4-3.2) favoring the TPI group. For the ITT and per-protocol analyses, the group differences in pain scores were consistent with a medium effect size. The main finding of this randomized clinical trial is that adults with chronic abdominal wall pain who received a TPI reported significantly lower pain scores at month 3 follow-up compared with patients who received a TAP block.

Counting ribs and thoracic levels under ultrasound: a systematized technical protocol for both posterior and anterior approaches.

Over the last two decades, the clinical applications of diagnostic and interventional ultrasound have expanded rapidly. When analyzing the chest wall and thoracic region, ultrasound has previously been shown to reliably identify chest wall pathologies like rib fracture and slipping rib syndrome, as well as having fundamentally changed perioperative management and patient outcomes after the emergence of point-of-care ultrasound. In addition, ultrasound guidance has recently become more popular for multiple blocks in the field of regional anesthesia and pain medicine. In this technical report, we systematize an ultrasound-guided protocol for counting ribs and thoracic levels for both posterior and anterior approaches, which does not require level confirmation by fluoroscopy. With this protocol, we hope to create an effective educational resource to support physicians from any specialty background as they engage in point-of-care ultrasound applications in the thoracic region.

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Clinical Outcomes: A Retrospective Case Series.

PURPOSE: Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is a rapidly expanding field within neuromodulation; however, there is limited data on therapeutic efficacy. This study describes the indications and clinical outcomes for patients undergoing PNS for chronic pain states. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of adults undergoing PNS implantation from 2004 to 2017 at an academic medical center. The primary outcomes were changes in numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores, opioid utilization in oral morphine milligram equivalent (MME), and self-reported patient functioning at 6 months postoperatively. Infectious and device-related complications were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients underwent PNS implantation, including 59 patients that received a preceding PNS trial (59/78; 76% progression rate) and 13 that did not receive a PNS trial. The most common indication for stimulation was occipital neuralgia (47%) followed by lower-extremity neuropathies (17%). PNS implantation was associated with 6-month reductions in pain scores (7 [6, 8] baseline vs. 4 [2, 5] 6 months; P < 0.001) and opioid utilization (eg, median 60 [31, 104] vs. 18 [0, 52] MME among those with baseline opioid use; P < 0.001). Median functional improvement was 73% (50%, 88%). Seven patients (10%) suffered a postoperative surgical site infection at a median of 50 (30, 124) days, of which five devices were removed. CONCLUSION: Peripheral nerve stimulation was associated with reduced pain scores, lower opioid utilization, and improved patient function at 6 months. These data support PNS as a potentially effective nonopioid analgesic modality in chronic pain, though prospective multicenter evaluation is warranted to evaluate longer-term outcomes.

Peri-procedural Management of Implanted Spinal Cord Stimulators in Patients Undergoing Radiofrequency Ablation: A Case Report and Manufacturer-Specific Recommendations.

INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and spinal cord stimulation (SCS) are 2 common modalities used in management of various pain conditions. RFA generates heat and an electromagnetic field that can theoretically interfere with the functionality and longevity of the SCS device. This is problematic for patients who need RFA and have previously undergone implantation of an SCS device. CASE DESCRIPTION: We present a case highlighting the safe use of bipolar RFA in a patient who had previously undergone implantation of a cervical SCS device. DISCUSSION: We also present device-specific industry guidelines and recommendations for performing RFA in patients following SCS device implantation.

Pain medicine fellow neuromodulation surgical skill assessment tool: a pilot.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an evidence-based therapy for the treatment of refractory pain. Current American College of Graduate Medical Education requirements for pain medicine fellowship graduation include observation of five neuromodulation cases. Matriculating fellows have varying degrees of technical skill, training, and experience. The purpose of this study was to use an innovative skill-based assessment tool using the validated Zwisch scale to evaluate fellow surgical performance during SCS cases. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey SETTING: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. SUBJECTS: Consultant faculty (10) in the Division of Pain Medicine and pain medicine fellows (5). METHODS: A list of faculty-driven neuromodulation surgical objectives was formed and a rubric was created that focused on technical approach, imaging, epidural access and wound closure. Consultants who perform surgical cases were instructed to use the Zwisch scale as a guide to evaluate fellow surgical performance during a neuromodulation case. Faculty and fellows were surveyed before and after implementation of the tool to determine their satisfaction with use of the skill assessment tool. RESULTS: The consultants reported they were more satisfied, consistent, and efficient with feedback provided to the trainee on every aspect of neuromodulation surgical cases. The improvement was most significant during the fellows' intraoperative skill assessment. The fellows indicated increased satisfaction, improved communication, and increased efficiency of feedback when the tool was utilized. The fellows reported greater intraoperative skill assessment and consistency of feedback provided. CONCLUSIONS: The diverse nature of primary specialty backgrounds observed in pain medicine fellowship training offers a unique opportunity to assess and improve fellow skill and surgical competence in the field of neuromodulation. Both faculty and fellows reported improved satisfaction, consistency and efficiency with feedback provided. Importantly, this pilot project observed that implementation of a skill assessment tool was beneficial for both the faculty and fellow as the feedback received was viewed as strongly beneficial to the educational experience.

Nonsurgical integrative inpatient treatments for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: a multi-arm randomized controlled pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a chronic condition that causes low back pain and neurogenic claudication, often resulting in significant limitation of daily activities. In this open-label randomized controlled pilot study, we assessed the safety and feasibility of 4-week novel integrative inpatient treatments for LSS. METHODS: Thirty-six symptomatic LSS patients were randomly and equally allocated to one of the three groups: Mokhuri Chuna treatment 1 (MT1) group, Mokhuri Chuna treatment 2 (MT2) group, or conventional management treatment (CMT) group. MT1 patients were treated with herbal medication, Mokhuri Chuna, and acupuncture, and received daily physician consultation; MT2 patients were treated with Mokhuri Chuna and acupuncture without any herbal medication, and received daily physician consultation; and CMT patients received conventional pain management therapy that included epidural steroid injection, oral NSAID, and muscle relaxant medication, along with daily physiotherapy. The primary outcome of this pilot study was safety as measured by the type and incidence of adverse events (AEs). The secondary outcome measures included VAS score for low back pain and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, Oxford Claudication Score (OCS), walking capacity on a 50 m flat track and treadmill, and EuroQol-5D score. Magnetic resonance imaging was also performed up to 6 months after treatment cessation. RESULTS: Thirty-four treated patients were included in the analysis, based on the modified intention-to-treat principle. No serious AEs were observed or reported. Compared to the CMT group, the MT1 and MT2 groups did show significant improvement at 3 and 6 months in various domains, including pain (VAS score for leg and back pain) and function (OCS and treadmill walking). CONCLUSION: These novel multimodal integrative treatments for LSS are both clinically safe and logistically feasible. Larger, adequately powered randomized controlled trials will be necessary to assess comparative efficacy and thoroughly analyze the cost-effectiveness of each treatment approach. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER CRIS: KCT0001218.

Procedural predictors of epidural blood patch efficacy in spontaneous intracranial hypotension.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Epidural blood patch (EBP) is a safe and effective treatment for spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH), but clinical and procedural variables that predict EBP efficacy remain nebulous. METHODS: This study is an institutional review board-approved retrospective case series with dichotomized EBP efficacy defined at 3 months. The study included 202 patients receiving 604 EBPs; iatrogenic cerebrospinal fluid leaks were excluded. RESULTS: Of the EBPs, 473 (78%) were single-level, 349 (58%) lumbar, 75 (12%) bilevel, and 56 (9%) multilevel (≥3 levels). Higher volume (OR 1.64; p<0.0001), bilevel (3.17, 1.91-5.27; p<0.0001), and multilevel (117.3, 28.04-490.67; p<0.0001) EBP strategies predicted greater efficacy. Only volume (1.64, 1.47-1.87; p<0.0001) remained significant in multivariate analysis. Site-directed patches were more effective than non-targeted patches (8.35, 0.97-72.1; p=0.033). Lower thoracic plus lumbar was the most successful bilevel strategy, lasting for a median of 74 (3-187) days. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of EBP in SIH, volume, number of spinal levels injected, and site-directed strategies significantly correlated with greater likelihood of first EBP efficacy. Volume and leak site coverage likely explain the increased efficacy with bilevel and multilevel patches. In patients with cryptogenic leak site, and either moderate disability, negative prognostic brain MRI findings for successful EBP, or failed previous lumbar EBP, a low thoracic plus lumbar bilevel EBP strategy is recommended. Multilevel EBP incorporating transforaminal administration and fibrin glue should be considered in patients refractory to bilevel EBP. An algorithmic approach to treating SIH is proposed.

Office-Based Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Disease: A Systematic Review of Recent Human Studies.

BACKGROUND: The use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in clinical applications for the treatment of musculoskeletal disease is steadily increasing in office-based practice. The so-called "first generation" of MSCs is defined as autologous stem cells that have undergone minimal manipulation and are used for a homologous purpose. Systematic reviews of the clinical trials completed to date of such MSCs enable practitioners to better understand what is currently known about the outcomes and side effects of such treatments. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review of human clinical studies of office-based MSC therapy for the treatment of painful degenerative musculoskeletal conditions. METHODS: A search of the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases was conducted from 2006 through September 2016. Seven hundred sixty-one records were identified from database searching, and two records from reference review of included papers. Studies with human subjects that evaluated treatment of musculoskeletal disease with minimally manipulated MSCs were included. RESULTS: Eight studies were included in this review based on selection criteria. A total of 941 patients were included, 841 of whom received cellular products, and no significant adverse events were reported. Symptomatology generally improved, though no differences were seen over controls where present. CONCLUSION: Support in the literature is strongest for the use of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) injections for the treatment of knee pain, but applications of the use of BMAC and peripheral blood-derived MSCs for the treatment of hip pain, tendon pain, and disc pain have all been reported. Further research is required, with large randomized controlled trials.

Factors Influencing Immediate Post-Residency Career Decisions for Graduating Anesthesiology Residents.

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the factors that influence post-residency career decisions following anesthesiology residency training. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between demographic and academic variables and immediate post-residency positions. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of anesthesiology resident files from 2000 to 2014 at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN). Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to assess relationships between demographic and academic factors and post-residency positions. RESULTS: Of the 263 anesthesiologists included, 120 (45.6%) pursued fellowship training, 110 (41.8%) entered private practice, and 33 (12.5%) entered directly into academic positions. Factors associated with career choice in univariate analyses included age, gender, country of citizenship, country of medical school, type of medical degree, and the number of peer-reviewed publications. In multivariable analyses, age, gender, and number of publications were significant predictors of post-residency career choice. Specifically, older residents were less likely to pursue fellowship training and more likely to directly enter academic positions. Males were more likely to obtain private practice positions compared to females, who were more likely to pursue advanced fellowship training. Nearly all residents entering into academic positions had at least one peer-reviewed publication. CONCLUSIONS: In this 15-year analysis of anesthesiology resident career decisions, age, gender, and number of publications were the primary predictors of career decisions. Future studies are needed to determine generalizability and to evaluate additional socioeconomic factors with the ultimate goal of optimizing residency recruitment and training initiatives in congruence with resident career interests and departmental goals.

Opioids: Clinical Practice, Monitoring, and Medicolegal Considerations.

BACKGROUND: In the past decade, opioid use in the general population of the US has increased dramatically. Concomitantly, opioid-related morbidity and mortality have also risen steeply. The causes of opioid over-prescribing are multifactorial, with pressure from medical agencies, patients, aggressive patient-directed marketing, and use of patient surveys as an evaluation tool to unduly influence medical providers' decision-making. Providers also have significant concerns regarding scrutiny from their medical board and exposure to medicolegal liability. CONTENT: To provide the basis for best practice recommendations, several aspects of modern opioid prescribing practice require review. The practicing clinician should be aware of: (a) the pervasiveness of current opioid prescribing within the US; (b) the availability and applicability of clinical tools used to assess patient risk; (c) the new guidelines designed to facilitate appropriate and safe medical use of opioids; (d) the incorporation of clinical tools and best documentation practices to reduce medicolegal exposure. SUMMARY: On completion of this review, the reader should be able to recognize the magnitude of the problem of opioid over-prescribing in the US and identify several patient risk factors for opioid misuse, abuse, and/or diversion. Specifically, better familiarity with the recently published CDC guidelines for opioid prescribing will help ensure the adoption of best-use practices that maximize therapeutic efficacy while attenuating the possibility of harm to patients. A thorough review of the legal principles and risk-mitigation strategies relevant to opioid prescribing will also lessen the clinician's exposure to medicolegal liability.

Utilization of Leads After Permanent Implant in Spinal Cord Stimulator Systems.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine the frequency and clinical indications associated with implantation of single vs. dual percutaneous lead spinal cord stimulator (SCS) systems and to look further into how these leads are utilized for treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of all patients undergoing SCS implantation between January 2001 and December 2013 with a minimum of 2 years of clinical follow-up was performed. Number of trial leads and implanted leads was recorded. For patients with dual-lead systems, it was noted if and when the second lead was used, along with the clinical indication for lead activation. RESULTS: In the 259-patient cohort, 15.8% (n = 41) patients underwent placement of a single-lead system, 83.0% (n = 215) underwent placement of a dual-lead system, and 1.2% (n = 3) underwent placement of 3-lead systems. Placement of dual-lead systems was similar among all indication groups. Of those patients with a dual-lead system in place, 88.1% utilized both leads and average time to programming of the second lead was 2.3 months. The most common reason to activate the second lead was inadequate stimulation coverage. Five of the 41 patients with single-lead systems underwent an additional surgery to implant a second lead due to inadequate stimulation with 1 lead. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the first descriptive analysis of the frequency of single- and dual-lead SCS systems. This report indicates that dual-lead systems are most often placed and both leads are required for optimal patient therapy.